Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Article dans une revue

Influence of the number of dynamic analyses on the accuracy of structural response estimates

Abstract : Non-linear dynamic analysis is often used to develop fragility curves in the framework of seismic risk assessment and performance-based earthquake engineering. In the present article fragility curves are derived from randomly-generated clouds of structural-response results using: least-squares and sum-of-squares regression and maximum-likelihood estimation. Different statistical measures are used to estimate the quality of fragility functions derived by considering varying numbers of ground motions. Graphs are proposed that can be used as guidance on how many calculations are required for the three approaches. The effectiveness of the results is demonstrated by their application to a structural model. The results show that the least-squares method for deriving fragility functions converges much faster than the maximum-likelihood and sum-of-squares approaches. With the least-squares approach a few dozen records might be sufficient to obtain satisfactory estimates, while using the maximum-likelihood approach may require several times more calculations to reach the same accuracy.
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [32 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger
Contributeur : Pierre Gehl Connectez-vous pour contacter le contributeur
Soumis le : jeudi 12 février 2015 - 10:10:56
Dernière modification le : mercredi 3 août 2022 - 04:03:02
Archivage à long terme le : : dimanche 16 avril 2017 - 07:12:17


Fichiers éditeurs autorisés sur une archive ouverte




Pierre Gehl, John Douglas, Darius Seyedi. Influence of the number of dynamic analyses on the accuracy of structural response estimates. Earthquake Spectra, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, 2015, 31 (1), pp.97-113. ⟨10.1193/102912EQS320M⟩. ⟨hal-00864834v2⟩



Consultations de la notice


Téléchargements de fichiers