Accéder directement au contenu Accéder directement à la navigation
Article dans une revue

Comparisons among the five ground-motion models developed using RESORCE for the prediction of response spectral accelerations due to earthquakes in Europe and the Middle East

John Douglas 1 Sinan Akkar 2 Gabriele Ameri 3 Pierre-Yves Bard 4 Dino Bindi 5 Julian J. Bommer 6 Sanjay Singh Bora 7 Fabrice Cotton 4 Boumédiène Derras 8 Marcel Hermkes 7 Nicolas Kuehn 7 Lucia Luzi 9 Marco Massa 9 Francesca Pacor 9 Carsten Riggelsen 7 M. Abdullah Sandikkaya 2 Frank Scherbaum 7 Peter J. Stafford 6 Paola Traversa 10
1 BRGM - Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières (BRGM)
2 METU - Middle East Technical University [Ankara]
3 FUGRO-Geoter
4 ISTerre - Institut des Sciences de la Terre
5 CEDIM - Centre for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology
6 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering [Imperial College London]
7 Institute of Earth and Environmental Science [Potsdam]
8 Risques - Risques
LGIT - Laboratoire de Géophysique Interne et Tectonophysique
9 INGV - Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia – Sezione di Milano
10 DIN-CEIDRE TEGG-Service Geologie Geotecnique
Abstract : This article presents comparisons among the five ground-motion models described in other articles within this special issue, in terms of data selection criteria, characteristics of the models and predicted peak ground and response spectral accelerations. Comparisons are also made with predictions from the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) models to which the models presented here have similarities (e.g. a common master database has been used) but also differences (e.g. some models in this issue are nonparametric). As a result of the differing data selection criteria and derivation techniques the predicted median ground motions show considerable differences (up to a factor of two for certain scenarios), particularly for magnitudes and distances close to or beyond the range of the available observations. The predicted influence of style-of-faulting shows much variation among models whereas site amplification factors are more similar, with peak amplification at around 1s. These differences are greater than those among predictions from the NGA models. The models for aleatory variability (sigma), however, are similar and suggest that ground-motion variability from this region is slightly higher than that predicted by the NGA models, based primarily on data from California and Taiwan.
Keywords : strong-motion data ground-motion models ground-motion prediction equations style of faulting site amplification aleatory variability epistemic uncertainty Europe Middle East
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Liste complète des métadonnées

Littérature citée [20 références]  Voir  Masquer  Télécharger
https://hal-brgm.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00862428
Contributeur : John Douglas Connectez-vous pour contacter le contributeur
Soumis le : lundi 16 septembre 2013 - 16:09:23
Dernière modification le : mardi 18 janvier 2022 - 14:26:05
Archivage à long terme le : : vendredi 20 décembre 2013 - 13:55:38

Fichier

Vignette du document
douglasetal2014share.pdf
Fichiers produits par l'(les) auteur(s)

Identifiants

Collections

IFSTTAR | INSU | UNIV-SAVOIE | BRGM | CNRS | OSUG | ISTERRE | IRD | EDF | IRSTEA | INRAE | UGA

Citation

John Douglas, Sinan Akkar, Gabriele Ameri, Pierre-Yves Bard, Dino Bindi, et al.. Comparisons among the five ground-motion models developed using RESORCE for the prediction of response spectral accelerations due to earthquakes in Europe and the Middle East. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Springer Verlag, 2014, 12 (1), pp.341-358. ⟨10.1007/s10518-013-9522-8⟩. ⟨hal-00862428⟩

Exporter

BibTeX TEI DC DCterms EndNote

Partager

Métriques

Les métriques sont temporairement indisponibles